The debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens

However much the snowden revelations may have contributed to the debate over privacy versus anti-terrorism efforts, americans today – after a series of terrorist events at home and abroad – are more concerned that anti-terrorist programs don’t go far enough than they are about restrictions on civil liberties. Yes i agree the government should have our backlook what we do for them many terrorists have been caught because of their surveillance, and, honestly, it doesn't hurt us i think the government should keep watch on usthey protect us from terrorists and if your not doing anything wrong, you won't be worried about them finding you. News about surveillance of citizens by government commentary and archival information about surveillance of citizens by government from the new york times. They also seemed certain to intensify debate in washington over what the government must do to address its substantial weaknesses in cybersecurity, long the subject of dire warnings but seldom acted upon by agencies, congress or the white house.

What kind of power should government have over your life no matter how righteous that government claims to be, we must, as citizens, ask ourselves whether that government is still useful to us, and what kind of power it should be allowed to wield the ndaa is truly a perfect representation of the kind of power the government would like. How much power should govt have over the internet the internet must be maintained and controled by private citizens and business to say the government has the answer to security concerns is the same as saying we, the people, are too incompitant to do it our selves june 21, 2010 at 3:48 pm . America becomes less democratic when the $3 trillion executive branch uses its resources to tilt the debate in its favor of course, a democratic government has an obligation to inform and be transparent citizens need to know the government’s policies and plans.

Yes, it should you don't have anything to worry about if you aren't doing anything wrong if you aren't doing anything wrong, it doesn't matter whether the government is watching live your life in the open however, if you have something to hide, you should probably be in jail anyway innocent people hide nothing.

How much control should the government have by tim 12 comments share 8 tweet 18 pin +1 the first priority of the government should be to protect its citizens from outside forces that try to compromise our freedoms there are certain things that humans can do better through coordinated effort, and we so over-populated, that. Yes i think that we should have government surviellance if you have nothing to hide then why not have cameras for people who really do have something to hide cameras is a really good way to catch the criminals that roam the streets since you live a country you have to give up some rights to the country anyway so why not give one more. How much further should the government go to safeguard its citizens some have proposed that foreign students studying the united states be monitored mor e closely.

The agency said hackers stole “sensitive information,” including addresses, health and financial history, and other private details, from 197 million people who had been subjected to a government background check, as well as 18 million others, including their spouses and friends. A conservative position would argue against the intrusion of big government in the personal information of its citizens a liberal argument might insist that the government should be trusted with access and use of big data. As the debate continues over repeal of the affordable care act and what might replace it, a growing share of americans believe that the federal government has a responsibility to make sure all americans have health care coverage, according to a new pew research center survey.

The debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens

Most of those on the other side of the issue – people who say the government does not have a responsibility to ensure health coverage – say on a subsequent question that the government should continue medicare and medicaid (32% of the overall public), while just 5% of the public says the government should have no role in health care. How can the privacy rights of us citizens be balanced against the government’s need to secure its citizens and their information assets government itself the debate continues as we attempt to balance i ssues of national security and the public's right to liberty and privacy there are many concerns over how the government acquires its.

  • Should the government have access to its citizens’ data february 21, the question posed is the major question in the government access debate: should the government be able to use farook and malik’s private information in a court of law in the end, the court ruled that apple did not have to allow the fbi to enter the iphone.
  • The first priority of the government should be to protect its citizens from outside forces that try to compromise our freedoms the ultimate reason for this provision is to ensure that the nation is sustained for as long as possible.
  • To what extent should the executive branch and an agency such as the nsa, which is relatively insulated from the political process and public accountability, have a significant power over citizens.

Currently, 60% of americans say the government should be responsible for ensuring health care coverage for all americans, compared with 38% who say this should not be the government’s responsibility the share saying it is the government’s responsibility has increased from 51% last year and now stands at its highest point in nearly a decade. Of course, a democratic government has an obligation to inform and be transparent citizens need to know the government’s policies and plans we have a right to know which companies receive government contracts, how to collect insurance benefits and social security payments and what public school educational reform will look like but too often, the government uses its information machinery to do more than simply inform us about a policy. The only time the government should involve itself with people’s lives is if crimes are being or have been committed anyone committing a crime has pretty much given up their right to any kind of privacy, as is only right.

the debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens Debate about whether government should be involved in the lives of people - and if so, how much  should government be involved in the lives of the people add a new topic  the government should not have complete control over the lives of citizens but a degree of involvement is necessary for order and consistent justice. the debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens Debate about whether government should be involved in the lives of people - and if so, how much  should government be involved in the lives of the people add a new topic  the government should not have complete control over the lives of citizens but a degree of involvement is necessary for order and consistent justice. the debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens Debate about whether government should be involved in the lives of people - and if so, how much  should government be involved in the lives of the people add a new topic  the government should not have complete control over the lives of citizens but a degree of involvement is necessary for order and consistent justice.
The debate over how much information the government should have about its citizens
Rated 4/5 based on 45 review
Download